They did not forget. I linked the discussion to Guillaume and he said that the token is correct. Sorry for not mentioning that sooner.
I was trying to determine if there was some sort of WH40K thing that lead to this being brought up as errata. He is not an officer, so as a veteran line trooper it is not a stretch to think he would be armed with a bolter.
I get that people see patterns all the time, but there is certainly no set pattern that most single-figure units have pistols.
Sgt Telion does not have a pistol.
Sgt Elias does not have one either.
(Sgts are about 3:5 pistols, but it is certainly not all of them.)
Cpt Sicarius doesn't have a pistol.
So Br. Vandius is hardly the only exception to the proposed pattern.
He is an Ancient (veteran) and not a Sgt or Captain, which to my mind would give him less chance of having a pistol.
Sorry if I seem to be arguing about this, I am just trying to find a reasonable set of rules to help people reason through such things and be able to resolve a question during a game. If the game mechanics are applied consistently and logically, it makes it easier to deal with questions. So I was digging into this one to try and understand the situation.
Not sure if this is coming across as I intend, apologies in advance if I am not being clear. I did not mean anything by the discussion, as I said I was just trying to understand where people were coming from.
|